At that moment, he argued, Britain was entering a new phase of its relationship with Europe and the rest of the world, and where it ends up depends a great deal on where it's come from.He stated that the stories needed to be told again and again so that future generations can get a sense of their identity.Furthermore, he believed that Britain's history comprised a number of tales worth telling: Criticisms The main criticism of "A History of Britain" is that it mostly revolves around England and its history, rather than that of the entire British Isles (England, Scotland, Wales, and the island of Ireland).
menschenkunde online dating - History of britain simon schama online dating
It gives short shrift to the Celtic inhabitants and civilisation of the British Isles, including England.
[  ] In a BBC interview, Simon Schama stated that rather than designating different periods of screen time to different nations, he focused on the relationships between the different nations, primarily England and Scotland.
This appears to be truer in "Nations", "The Body of the Queen" and "Britannia Incorporated" than at times when each of the nations is involved in the same event, such as the two episodes involving the revolutions in the seventeenth century, "The British Wars" and "Revolutions".
By the latter episodes, however, all "Three Kingdoms" are parts of the United Kingdom.
Infobox nature documentary bgcolour = show_name = A History of Britain caption = Series title card picture_format = 16:9 audio_format = Stereo runtime = 59 minutes creator = developer = producer = Janet Lee Liz Hartford executive_producer = Martin Davidson presented = , each of the 15 episodes allows Schama to examine a particular period and tell of its events in his own style.
All the programmes are of 59 minutes' duration and were broadcast over three series, ending 18 June 2002. Background When Simon Schama was approached by the BBC to make the series, he knew that it would be a big commitment and took a long time to decide if it were something he wanted to do.He surmised that if he was to take it on, he would want to "dive in" and be very involved with the production.Besides writing the scripts, which the historian saw as a "screenplay", he also had an input into other aspects, including the choice of locations.[  ] He was concerned that even 15 hour-long programmes would not be enough to tell a story of such magnitude.Accordingly, he and the producers determined that to give each king and queen absolute equal coverage was out of the question: "That way lies madness," he said.Instead, he worked out the essential themes and stories that demanded to be related.